diff --git a/change-check.html b/change-check.html index e928057..847bf6a 100644 --- a/change-check.html +++ b/change-check.html @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ The problem How we work Who we are + Change Check Book a conversation @@ -88,6 +89,7 @@ The problem How we work Who we are + Change Check Book a conversation diff --git a/index.html b/index.html index bcf79aa..1317a3c 100644 --- a/index.html +++ b/index.html @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ The problem How we work Who we are + Change Check Book a conversation @@ -130,6 +131,7 @@ The problem How we work Who we are + Change Check Book a conversation @@ -159,6 +161,7 @@ You can buy the software. You can write the procedures. And still watch the whole thing quietly fall apart. Because the new way asks people to change — and people don't resist change to be difficult. They resist it because it threatens something: their standing, their habits, the thing that's made them the one everyone relies on. The veteran who won't quite share what he knows. The supervisor who nods in the meeting and does it the old way Monday morning. The blame that starts flying the first time something goes wrong. None of that is a character flaw. It's how people work — and it's the part that quietly determines whether your investment pays off — or sits on a shelf. + Where does your team sit? Take the two‑minute Change Check → diff --git a/inga.html b/inga.html index 3ccb11d..860cbd5 100644 --- a/inga.html +++ b/inga.html @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ The problem How we work Who we are + Change Check Book a conversation @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ The problem How we work Who we are + Change Check Book a conversation diff --git a/style.css b/style.css index 307922d..3dc74bd 100644 --- a/style.css +++ b/style.css @@ -367,3 +367,8 @@ a:focus-visible, .btn:focus-visible { outline: 2px solid var(--amber); outline-o border-radius: 16px 16px 0 0; box-shadow: 0 -8px 26px rgba(15, 23, 41, 0.16); } .float-cta .btn { display: block; text-align: center; } } + +/* Change Check teaser on the dark statement band */ +.statement-link { margin: 22px 0 0; } +.statement-link a { font-family: 'DM Sans', sans-serif; font-size: 0.78rem; text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 0.08em; color: var(--amber); text-decoration: none; border-bottom: 1px solid currentColor; } +.statement-link a:hover { color: #fff; }
Because the new way asks people to change — and people don't resist change to be difficult. They resist it because it threatens something: their standing, their habits, the thing that's made them the one everyone relies on. The veteran who won't quite share what he knows. The supervisor who nods in the meeting and does it the old way Monday morning. The blame that starts flying the first time something goes wrong.
None of that is a character flaw. It's how people work — and it's the part that quietly determines whether your investment pays off — or sits on a shelf.
Where does your team sit? Take the two‑minute Change Check →