From 9428e7e3ee9ab9b2eb8036a34302f5c5254fa41a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Victory Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 19:11:10 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Add Open Frame inspiration board (internal staging page) Private noindexed page rendering the framework inspiration board for remote review on oc-preview (staging). Not linked from any public page. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 --- inspiration-board.html | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 135 insertions(+) create mode 100644 inspiration-board.html diff --git a/inspiration-board.html b/inspiration-board.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..abf6985 --- /dev/null +++ b/inspiration-board.html @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ + + + + + + + +Open Frame — Inspiration Board (internal) + + + + + + + + +
+

Internal · working board · not for clients

+

"Open Frame" — Inspiration Board

+

The framework library OC draws from to build its own change method. Started 2026-06-26 from the Mike + Inga strategy meeting and the Open Field analysis.

+ +
+

The operating rule: a framework itself is generally not protected IP — the author's catchphrase / name on it is. Draw freely from the established commons; coin OC's own catchphrases for what we assemble; cite named authors and don't rebrand their names. OC's defensible value = the synthesis + manufacturer-safe translation + our own named loop/modules + the sovereign agent + the measurement. Not legal advice — verify trademarks before publishing derived copy.

+
+

Legend: 🟢 established public concept (fair game) · 🟡 named author/trademark to cite · ⭐ already an OC anchor.

+ +

1 · The two states — defensive vs. open (OC's core)

+ + + + + +
FrameworkOriginCore ideaOC angle
Above / Below the Line 🟡⭐Conscious Leadership Group (Dethmer, Chapman, Klemp)Closed/defensive (below) vs. open/curious (above), right nowOC's most translatable idea; the Change Check sits here
Drama Triangle → TED* 🟡⭐Karpman (1968) → David EmeraldVictim/Persecutor/Rescuer → Creator/Challenger/CoachThe "shift" out of blame; cite both
Ladder of Inference 🟢Chris ArgyrisLeaping from data → defensive conclusionsWhy people "react"; slows the jump
Fixed vs. Growth Mindset 🟡Carol DweckAbility as fixed vs. developableWhy veterans guard "it's just experience"
+ +

2 · Threat & safety (the nervous-system layer)

+ + + + + + +
FrameworkOriginCore ideaOC angle
4 Stages of Psychological Safety 🟡Timothy ClarkInclusion → Learner → Contributor → Challenger safetyOpen Field leaned on "challenger safety"
SCARF 🟡David RockStatus/Certainty/Autonomy/Relatedness/Fairness = social threatsNames why a small change feels threatening
Amygdala hijack / threat response 🟢neuroscience (popularized by Goleman)Threat → cortisol → fight/flight/fawn; ~24h to re-regulate"Calm the nervous system first"
Window of tolerance 🟡Dan SiegelThe zone where you can think + relateTrauma-informed tie; regulation
"Rigor and soul" / conscious leadership 🟡⭐Amy Elizabeth Fox (Mobius)Trauma-informed leadershipOC's anchor reference
+ +

3 · The change journey (process)

+ + + + + +
FrameworkOriginCore ideaOC angle
Unfreeze → Change → Refreeze 🟢Kurt LewinThe original change modelFoundational, old, freely usable
Change Curve 🟢adapted from Kübler-RossGrief stages applied to changeThe emotional arc of a rollout
Transitions: Endings → Neutral Zone → New Beginnings 🟡William BridgesChange is external; transition is the inner shiftStrong OC fit — the part SW's systems don't touch
Diffusion of Innovations 🟢Everett RogersInnovators → laggards adoption curveWho adopts the new system, when
+ +

4 · Systems & seeing the whole

+ + + + + + +
FrameworkOriginCore ideaOC angle
Operating manual / "do more with less" / tensegrity 🟢Buckminster FullerWhole-systems, anticipatory designMike's named influence — the systems-whole lens
Leverage Points 🟢Donella MeadowsWhere to intervene in a system (ranked)Maps to Open Field's "levers / intervention points"
Iceberg model 🟢systems-thinking commonsEvents → patterns → structures → mental modelsLook beneath the incident
Cynefin 🟡Dave SnowdenSimple/Complicated/Complex/Chaotic → match the approachDon't run a complex change like a simple one
Scenario planning 🟢Pierre Wack / Royal Dutch ShellRehearse multiple futuresInga raised it — futures thinking
+ +

5 · Agency & ownership

+ + + + +
FrameworkOriginCore ideaOC angle
Locus of control 🟢Julian RotterInternal vs. external control"You control how you show up" (Open Field)
100% responsibility 🟡⭐Conscious Leadership GroupOwnership over blameThe agency thread Inga flagged
Accountability ladder 🟢management commonsBelow-line excuses → above-line ownershipManufacturer-safe ownership language
+ +

6 · Team & sizing

+ + + + +
FrameworkOriginCore ideaOC angle
Forming/Storming/Norming/Performing 🟢Bruce TuckmanTeam development stagesWhere a team is in its arc
5 Dysfunctions of a Team 🟡Patrick LencioniTrust → conflict → commitment → accountability → resultsDiagnostic ladder for team friction
Dunbar's number / "two-pizza team" 🟢Robin Dunbar (~150) / BezosHuman group-size limitsThe bite-size sizing Mike likes; Open Field's 150 clusters
+ +

7 · Measurement & ROI (Inga's spine)

+ + + + + +
FrameworkOriginCore ideaOC angle
4 Levels of evaluation 🟡Donald KirkpatrickReaction → Learning → Behavior → ResultsThe move off one-time workshops → observable behavior + results
Chain of evidence / line of sight 🟢L&D commonsLink the work → org goalsInga's "chain of evidence" intake
Leading vs. lagging indicators 🟢management commonsPredictive vs. outcome metricsPick metrics owners feel early
ROI / Level 5 🟡Jack PhillipsAdds monetary ROI to KirkpatrickThe "prove the ROI" capstone
+ +

Through-lines (where OC coins its own catchphrases)

+
    +
  1. The two-state core. Below/above · drama/empowerment · threat/safe · defensive/curious · victim/creator — the same binary OC can own as a spectrum. → coin the catchphrase ("the line" / "the shift").
    2. +
  2. State → regulate → choose. Notice your nervous-system state → regulate → choose your stance. Neuroscience + agency = OC's loop — name it.
    3. +
  3. Change is a transition, not a project. Bridges + Kübler-Ross + Lewin = the human side SW's systems don't touch. OC's lane in one line.
    4. +
  4. Intervene at the right leverage point, sized right. Meadows + Cynefin + Dunbar/150 = OC's "where + how big" method.
    5. +
  5. Prove it with observable change. Kirkpatrick (behavior+results) + chain-of-evidence = OC's ROI spine (Inga). From "workshop" to "engagement with proof."
    6. +
+ +

The "Open Frame" assembly (working sketch)

+
    +
  • Intake / questionnaire = Inga's ~8-barriers diagnostic + the Change Check (above/below) → sets the chain-of-evidence baseline + reads the team's state.
    • +
  • Module 1 — See the line (two-state core).
    • +
  • Module 2 — Regulate (nervous system / safety / threat).
    • +
  • Module 3 — Own it (agency / 100% responsibility / locus of control).
    • +
  • Module 4 — Move together (team dynamics / conflict transformation / right-sizing).
    • +
  • Module 5 — Make it stick & prove it (transitions / leverage points / measurement + ROI).
    • +
  • Each module = an OC catchphrase + the manufacturer-safe translation + the diagnostic tie.
    • +
+ +

Next: confirm attributions + trademarks before publishing derived copy; pick OC's catchphrases for the through-lines + modules; map the intake to the chain-of-evidence (Inga + owner interviews); decide which frameworks make the v1 cut. This board is the menu, not the meal.

+
+ +